﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>IP Thoughts: Recent Comments</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:06:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Is Dell Trying to Self-Destruct?</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2010/04/27/is-dell-trying-to-selfdestruct.aspx#comment-3756372</link><dc:creator>Refurbished Computers</dc:creator><description>I totally agree you. There has been a big difference foreseen in Today's Dell and Dell Before. If Dell will keep on going with this strategy then one day they will be there from there they have started.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2010/04/27/is-dell-trying-to-selfdestruct.aspx#comment-3756372</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:04:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on North Face's Case is the South Butt</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/16/north-faces-case-is-the-south-butt.aspx#comment-2978170</link><dc:creator>Arthur W. Brown</dc:creator><description>Well said. Based on the language of the denials that Judge Sippel has thus far ordered, this is shaping up to be a rough case for "South Butt". Its clear that there is a problem when the judge quotes an entire rule of evidence in one of his orders, and another begins with a clever, attributed but uncited quote about thin ice and hot water. One is left to imagine how bad those motion calls really were...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think either the Judge is a little too defensive over the logo of his own Denali jacket, and ought to recuse himself, ;) , or the defense attorney isn't a very good salesman, and ought to take a quick course on how to convince others of the obvious.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/16/north-faces-case-is-the-south-butt.aspx#comment-2978170</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 03:02:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Equalization is Not Equal</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/23/equalization-is-not-equal.aspx#comment-2860740</link><dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator><description>Well said Rand.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/23/equalization-is-not-equal.aspx#comment-2860740</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:10:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Be Careful of What You Say - And More Careful of What You Don't</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2009/10/28/be-careful-of-what-you-say--and-more-careful-of-what-you-dont.aspx#comment-2826687</link><dc:creator>Fighting games</dc:creator><description>Great post, to be honest i read about it a lot and it still very interesting.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2009/10/28/be-careful-of-what-you-say--and-more-careful-of-what-you-dont.aspx#comment-2826687</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:45:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Steal Your Children's Future</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/01/steal-your-childrens-future.aspx#comment-2789629</link><dc:creator>Rand Bateman</dc:creator><description>I agree and as soon as people start actually paying for everything the government is doing, they will come to the conclusion that the government could function on less money.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; That is part of my problem with Obama's pledge of keeping taxes the same or giving a tax cut to 95% of tax payers.&amp;nbsp; You now have 95% of tax payers who have no reason to care what the government spends.&amp;nbsp; While you can keep adding taxes to the top 5%, eventually that well runs dry.&amp;nbsp; The top 5% either give up or move to a jurisdiction with more reasonable taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, history has shown over and over that taxes creep down.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; You may not be paying the tax today, but eventually you will.&amp;nbsp; A prime example is the Alternative Minimum Tax.&amp;nbsp; It was put in place to make sure that the very wealthy aren't able to avoid taxes.&amp;nbsp; Now it is hitting many middle class families.&amp;nbsp; The only way to control government spending is to have everyone pay in so that every tax increase hits everyone.&lt;br&gt;</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/01/steal-your-childrens-future.aspx#comment-2789629</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:33:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Steal Your Children's Future</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/01/steal-your-childrens-future.aspx#comment-2789188</link><dc:creator>David Boundy</dc:creator><description>I've always wondered why voters and politicians talk about tax "cuts."  There's no such thing as a tax "cut" except when there's a surplus.  There's only a tax shift to our children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We gotta get into the mindset that once we've decided how much we want government to spend, well, that's the amount we need government to tax.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2010/02/01/steal-your-childrens-future.aspx#comment-2789188</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:00:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on The Death of Business Method Patents</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2009/01/26/the-death-of-business-method-patents.aspx#comment-2654765</link><dc:creator>Blue Ocean Strategy</dc:creator><description>your article is admirable. that is true you shared. i really liked it.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2009/01/26/the-death-of-business-method-patents.aspx#comment-2654765</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:29:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Be Careful of What You Say - And More Careful of What You Don't</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2009/10/28/be-careful-of-what-you-say--and-more-careful-of-what-you-dont.aspx#comment-2638257</link><dc:creator>puzzle games</dc:creator><description>Nice post.....&lt;br /&gt;I was searching for the same from past two weeks and now got it here.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2009/10/28/be-careful-of-what-you-say--and-more-careful-of-what-you-dont.aspx#comment-2638257</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:53:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Utah Patent Application Update - Patent Applications Published on 7-26-07</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2007/07/26/patent-applications-published-on-72607.aspx#comment-2552923</link><dc:creator>software developer</dc:creator><description>Cool,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2007/07/26/patent-applications-published-on-72607.aspx#comment-2552923</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:14:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Utah Patent Application Update - Applications Published on 8-23-07</title><link>http://ipthoughts.com/2007/08/23/patent-applications-published-on-82307.aspx#comment-2529298</link><dc:creator>custom software</dc:creator><description>Cool,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There was alot of patents at this time!,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I dont understand how this works, do these people need to have made it to patent it,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or do they patent the idea?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the good work,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for bringing this up</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipthoughts.com/2007/08/23/patent-applications-published-on-82307.aspx#comment-2529298</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:37:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
